A Hopeful Court Decision You Should Know About

With Appropriate Links

On Monday, a federal trial court judge in Orange County issued a preliminary injunction against the California Attorney General (and all enforcement agencies) enforcing certain provisions of the Unsafe Handgun Act.

What’s key about this decision is that the judge — who had been at one point a state judge appointed by Gray Davis — saw through the manipulative, low-attention-span rhetoric. Low attention spans are the primary problem we have going forward.

The Unsafe Handgun Act is well-named if you want to ban handguns and are willing to lie to do so. The Act bans safe handguns from being sold legally in California. It makes an exception for police. Police use handguns deemed unsafe by the act all the time. Which was powerful evidence that the handguns aren’t unsafe at all.

Just because you call something unsafe, doesn’t mean it is. Anyone with an attention span knows this.

The Democrat strategy was banking on calling something “unsafe,” redefining “unsafe” to include things that are safe.

This judge saw through that. That is a very hopeful sign.

Here’s the text of the opinion accompanying and justifying the injunction :

https://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-03-20-Order-Granting-MPI2240711.1.pdf

Here’s a brief YouBoob video from a plaintiff in the case with his take-away:

The attorney who won this ruling for the plaintiff, Mr. Chuck Michel, has been an esteemed guest on The Republican Professor Podcast multiple times. Here is a YouBoob link to the last of those interviews:

Just providing you resources.
You have to do your own learning.

The professor can’t do that for you.

Not even a Republican Professor,

Love,
Lucas J. Mather